Evidence Intelligence for Complex Matters
Turn hours of evidence review into actionable intelligence in seconds.
Free credits for four deposition packages, or mix with Q&A. No credit card.
We don’t train on your matters. Security
Topic
Notice of hazard
Witness testified the wet floor sign was not present when she entered the aisle, and that she first saw an employee placing cones after she fell.
Topic-organized. Typically under 20 minutes. Not satisfied? We refund.
After processing, you don’t re-read for the timeline, it’s structured: credibility, key testimony, legal issues, liability and damages.
Timeline
24
Credibility
8
Testimony
41
Legal issues
6
Damages
12
Notice of wet floor reported to front desk
Smith Dep. 42:14–18You asked
What did the plaintiff say about prior injuries?
LawLM
Plaintiff denied prior back treatment in the first session, then acknowledged physical therapy two years earlier when shown the clinic records.
You asked
Where do the witnesses disagree about notice?
LawLM
Smith places notice on Tuesday morning. Jones denies any notice until after the fall. The accounts conflict on both timing and whether notice occurred at all.
You asked
Give me a settlement value range with assumptions.
From the record
Expected value
$412,000
Range (P10–P90)
$180k – $690k
Liability and damages scenarios with cites. If the record can’t support a value, we say so.
What you get from the record
Same matter. Plaintiff and defense both need to see it clearly.
Cited summaries
Topic-organized deposition summaries with page-and-line citations. Typically ready in under 20 minutes.
Not satisfied with a summary? We refund.
Case Analysis
The matter cockpit: timeline, credibility flags, key testimony, legal issues, and liability & damages, filterable across witnesses, with cites. Included with every deposition package.
Ask the record
Cited Q&A
Ask anything about the depositions and docs you selected. Answers come with page-and-line cites, open the transcript and check.
Cross-deposition
Find contradictions within and across witnesses. Built for impeachment prep and notice fights.
Case Valuator
Liability and damages scenarios from your depositions and docs, then an expected case value and range from that evidence. If the record can’t support a value, we say so.
Built for the file, not for a seat license
Pay for the deposition you run, not a seat you might not use.
ChatGPT with PDFs
- Fluent answers, hard to verify against the transcript
- No structured case dashboard across witnesses
- Will invent a settlement number if you ask
Seat-license legal AI
- Monthly seats whether the docket is busy or quiet
- Sales calls and onboarding before you touch a transcript
- Built for firms buying platforms, not one matter at a time
LawLM
- Page-and-line cites on claims, open the transcript and check
- Case Analysis, cross-deposition, and Case Valuator on your matter
- Pay per use. Live demo first. No monthly seat required.
From transcript to work product
-
01
Upload a deposition
Create a matter and drop in the transcript, or start on the live demo with no account.
-
02
Get the summary and Analysis
Typically under 20 minutes. Topic summary plus the Case Analysis dashboard, timeline through damages, ready to filter.
-
03
Ask, compare, value
Cited Q&A, Cross-deposition, or Case Valuator, then export what you need.
Built in practice
Founded by a litigator
LawLM started in 2024 after too many hours of manual dep review. Built for the docket, not the demo stage. About
ABA publication
How LLMs are transforming litigation workflows, published by the American Bar Association. Read the whitepaper
Your data stays yours
Private models. We don’t train on your matters. Encryption, 2FA, case-level segregation. Security
See LawLM on a real matter
Explore the live demo, or sign up. Free credits for four deposition packages, or mix with Q&A.
Questions? support@lawlm.ai · Pricing · Security ·