Compare
ChatGPT with PDFs vs LawLM on a deposition.
LawLM is deposition intelligence for litigators with heavy deposition dockets, plaintiff or defense. ChatGPT is a general model, and it is often the right tool for a cheap, fluent pass on a question that will never need a page-and-line cite.
Use LawLM when the output has to be checked against the transcript, or when you ask for a number the record might not support. Cited summaries are typically under 20 minutes. Full product
Free credits for four deposition packages, or mix with Q&A. No credit card.
We don’t train on your matters. Security
It appears the witness may have indicated that signage was possibly not in place at the relevant time, and that staff later placed cones in the area. A reasonable settlement in a case like this could be in the mid six figures depending on venue and similar matters.
Fluent. No page. No line. A number if you ask.
Notice of hazard
Witness testified the wet floor sign was not present when she entered the aisle, and that she first saw an employee placing cones after she fell.
Fluent is not cited
ChatGPT wins on price for a one-off question with no file to defend. LawLM is the better tool when a partner, a client, or a motion deadline will ask you to open the page.
ChatGPT with PDFs
LawLM
Cites
ChatGPT with PDFs
Fluent prose. Hard to verify against page and line.
LawLM
Page-and-line cites. Open the transcript and check.
Dashboard
ChatGPT with PDFs
None. You re-prompt for timeline, credibility, damages.
LawLM
Same process on every deposition: timeline, credibility, key testimony, legal issues, liability and damages. The output does not move with the prompt. Included with the $49 package.
Cited Q&A
ChatGPT with PDFs
You prompt again. The answer moves, and it is hard to cite to page and line.
LawLM
You still ask in your own words. Cited Q&A on the selected record, $10. Page-and-line cites so you can check.
Settlement
ChatGPT with PDFs
Will invent a figure if you ask.
LawLM
Case Valuator. If the record cannot support a value, we say so. $10.
Cross-witness
ChatGPT with PDFs
You paste and hope the context window holds.
LawLM
Cross-deposition on the selected record, $10.
Your data
ChatGPT with PDFs
Consumer and many team plans can use chats to train unless you buy the right tier.
LawLM
Private models. We don’t train on your matters.
Price
ChatGPT with PDFs
Cheap or already paid for. Best for casual questions.
LawLM
$49 per deposition, cited summary and Case Analysis. $10 per question. No monthly seat.
If it’s wrong
ChatGPT with PDFs
You eat the time.
LawLM
Not satisfied with a summary? We refund. That refund is the summary, not cited Q&A or Case Valuator. You still check the cites.
If you already use ChatGPT
When is ChatGPT the right tool?
When you do not need to defend the answer against the transcript. Drafts, outlines, a first pass on a question that is not the record. The minute a partner or a client needs page and line, you are in LawLM.
Can’t I just write a better prompt?
You can, and the answer will move when the prompt moves. Case Analysis is the same process on every deposition: timeline, credibility, key testimony, legal issues, and liability and damages. Your framing belongs in cited Q&A, after that dashboard exists.
Can I see it on a matter that is not a client’s?
Yes. The live demo is a public file, and you do not need an account to open it.
See the difference on a live matter
Live demo first, or sign up. Free credits for four deposition packages, or mix with Q&A.
Questions? support@lawlm.ai · Pricing · Security ·